Introduction
The 1993 Mumbai blasts pointed to vulnerability along
India's coastline and the terrorist attack of 26 Nov 2011, revealed glaring
weakness in the Coastal Security. Securing India's coastline and the EEZ
involves multifarious agencies such as shipping, fisheries, customs, off share exploration
/ production agencies, tourism, scientific community, port authorities, coastal
state/UT government and the state / UT local police. Coordination among them is
a Herculean task. Coastal State / UT governments have been reluctant partners
in overall coastal schemes.
Coastal Security Threat Perception
Coastal security implies protection of assets and
infrastructure along the coast, preventing illegal exploitation of marine and
mineral resources within the EEZ, freedom of navigation along the Sea Lines of
Communication (SLOC) for merchant fleets and facilitating the nation's economy,
including the “blue economy,” to grow.
Coastal Security aims to achieve the following :
- By continuous surveillance, monitor all activities in India's territorial waters, contiguous seas and EEZ
- Counter infiltration attempts and attacks from state and non-state actors.
- Prevent illegal economic exploitation of marine and mineral resources from the sea.
- Prevent smuggling of arms, explosives, drugs and other contraband material.
- Counter acts of piracy, hijacking and criminal acts.
- Act against the presence of unseaworthy vessels.
Setting up a Robust Coastal Security Network
Coastal security should be tiered in nature, with
responsibility for each tier be allotted to a force which has the wherewithal
and training for its task. During hot pursuit, the tier system may not be
considered sacrosanct. There should be seamless flow of intelligence, with each
tier having built-in capability to react first in its area of responsibility.
There is a requirement of a dedicated central force for
coastal security under the Ministry of Home Affairs. There must be synergy
between all agencies (Coastal Security Force, Coast Guard and Navy) which will
be effected through periodic meeting and regular cross-training / exercises.
Marine Police
Till 26/11, Coastal States / UTs did not have any element of
the local police looking the coastal waters.After 26/11 they were instructed
to raise a Marine Police wing to patrol coastal seas upto 5km. However, the
States/ UTs resorted to ad hoc measures, leading to the creation of a force
incapable of carrying out its tasks. Coastal Police Stations are understaffed
and operations suffer due to lack of suitable manpower. Poor training and lack
of incentives to cover high risk inherent in such operations have largely been
responsible for the inefficient setup. The setting up of the National Academy
on Coastal Policing at Okha in District Dwarka, Gujarat is a commendable start.
It is being piloted by the Bureau of Police Research and Development, with a
core team from the Indian Navy, Coast Guard and BSF. The following additional
measures need to be adopted to address the shortcomings :
- Include personnel from the fishing community who are adept at operating in differing sea conditions. Lack of educational qualification should not be a barrier for recruitment.
- The present training of marine policemen, conducted by the Coast Guard, is barely of four weeks duration, whereas recruits selected to join the Indian Navy or Coast Guard undergo nearly two and half years training. Marine police should be imparted training for one year at least to enable them to operate efficiently on the seas. A Central Coastal Force training institute should be set up for training personnel selected for Marine Police forces. This institute may also be made responsible for upgradation training and specialised training.
- Due to the ad hoc measures adopted to equip the Marine police, boats purchased are lying unused due to the lack of training in handling and maintenance issues. Training and long-term maintenance should be built into contracts with the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM).
- Jetties are required to be constructed for Marine Police craft. These should be constructed at the earliest or regular berthing space taken on long term lease from ports. Presently, the Marine Police craft are encroaching on the Fisheries Department Jetties.
Exploiting the Human Resource Capital of the Coastal
Community
Interaction of the Navy, Coast Guard and Marine Police with
the coastal community should institutionalised. Intelligence Bureau, Customs
and Enforcement Directorate should also be incorporated in such interactions.
Schools for the children from the fishing community, on
lines of Sainik Schools should be set up to draw young sailors for the Coast
Guard, Marine Police and similar agencies.
Registration of Sea
Going Vessels
- It should be mandatory for all types of vessels going to sea or operating in backwaters/ rivers/lakes, irrespective of size, to have compulsory registration (as is the case with vehicles on land) with the port / coastal authorities. This will enable identification of owners, also.
- Every sea going vessel should be equipped with VHF / HF communication equipment and GPS compatible identification.
- Post 26/11, while initiatives were taken up to issue personal identity cards to coastal sea going communities, even now boats are often manned by personnel who lack identification/ verification of antecedents, hailing from different parts of the country. Crew manning sea going vessels should be in possession of suitable identity cards, post police verification. Maintaining record of the crew should also be mandatory.
Regulating Landing
Points
The coastline has numerous landing points suitable for small
vessels. Illegal activities like transfer of personnel or material can easily
take place from these as it is difficult to maintain fool proof surveillance or
security cover. State Governments need to identify and promulgate landing
points and monitor movement at these. This would enable concerned agencies to
be warned of undesirable activities taking place at unauthorised points,
particularly if coastal communities are also involved. Coastal Police Stations
should be given adequate legal powers and capabilities to check all landing
points under their beat.
Closer interaction with coastal communities, including
fisherman would make them feel as a part of the overall security setup. They
need to be apprised that restrictions placed on their normal activities by the
Police, Coast Guard or Navy are to protect them. Own agencies and
establishments too must take care to keep the interest of the coastal communities
in mind when placing curbs and restrictions.
Response Mechanism
Notwithstanding relations with neighbours, an assertive
posture is necessary for operations on the high seas. On receipt of actionable
intelligence, the first respondent should be the one nearest to the point where
hostile / illegal activity is reported to be taking place. The Naval ship /
Coast Guard vessels can build up to augment the forces. Helicopters aboard
naval ships and ready availability of MARCOS should facilitate early response. Technological
up-gradation and augmenting monitoring and surveillance capability must
continue.
Maritime Domain
Awareness
India has undertaken to share information on the seas with
its neighbours, Maldives, Mauritius, Seychelles, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand,
Indonesia and Sri Lanka. All relevant information would ultimately be fed to
the International Fusion Centre in Gurugram. Cooperation from the neighbours
would contribute immensely to aid Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA). However,
there is need to have a centralised system to collate information from all
sources to include, HUMINT, Coastal surveillance radar systems Satellite
imagery and other electronic sensors and electro optic sensors that are likely
to be deployed, as presently there is no institutional architecture to collate
all this information into intelligence and disseminate it in real time. For
this the structure and functioning of the Joint Operations Centre's set up need
to be strengthened.
Equipment
Procurement
To standardize the profile of seagoing vessels and craft
needed by the Marine Police, Customs and other agencies as also communication
equipment, the qualitative requirement for them should be issued by one agency
only, preferably the Navy in conjunction with Coast Guard.
The vessels being procured should include craft that can ply in shallow waters like airboats and Air Cushion Vehicles. The life cycle maintenance, provision of spares and tying up with OEM's for in-situ maintenance to reduce down time of any piece of equipment should also be contracted simultaneously.
Port Security
India has 16 major and 227 minor ports. Major ports have
been assigned CISF security. 64 minor ports handle export-import cargo, 54 of
which are International Ship and Port Facility Code (ISPS) compliant, while 10
are not. 163 ports lack requisite security. Even six years after sanction two
major ports still do not have radiation detection equipment. 64 ports handling
export-import cargo have no radiation detection equipment.
The provision of security to minor ports is the
responsibility of the Coastal State Governments through their State Maritime
Boards. The channel between anchorage (where a ship is anchored) to the port is
about one to two kilometres. This area is very vulnerable to crime.
Port congestion, poor management and lack of facilities for
dredging, mechanization and storage, effect operations to provide security and
optimise capacity of ports. The new Maritime Agenda aims to quadruple cargo
throughput by 2020, but most Indian ports are already operating at close to
100% capacity and any enhancement will require massive expansion programmes.
Considerable planning and investment is required to bring Indian ports to
international standards. In addition, hinterland connectivity in terms of efficient
railroad and fast highway connections also need to be upgraded along with
development of ports. Port security will be a vital factor in the mission to
increase ports enhanced capacities.
Facilitating a Blue
Economy
The livelihood of the population along the coast is linked
to fishing. The Indian Fisheries Act has been in operation since 1897. Based on
it coastal States/UTs have drafted their legislation. Fishing by non-mechanised
and mechanised vessels has been laid down by each state/UT separately. However,
uniform closure for 47 days is dictated for the East and West coasts during
different periods by the Central government. One of the factors that is
affecting the catch of the fishermen using non-mechanised craft is allowing
industrial pollutants to flow into the sea. This has adversely affected marine
life. Intervention by the Centre and National Green Tribunal is strongly
recommended.
Nations that have a large community dependent on the sea for
their livelihood have undertaken measures to augment the catches of fishing
vessels and the variety of the catch. Fish Aggregating Devices tethered to the
seabed are put up to attract fish and augment the catch of fishing vessels.
Since such devices cannot be deployed by individual fishermen or groups of fishermen
these should be undertaken by the State / UT governments or the Central
Government.
Central Coastal
Security Force
Coastal Security hinges on pro-active participation of State
/ UT Governments. This is often lacking. Though there are a number of Central
Government Ministries and departments involved, but there is no single agency
having overall authority. Unlike the deployment of BSF and ITBP along India's
land borders which are under the Ministry of Home Affairs and managed by the
Department of Border Management in the same Ministry, Coastal security is
primarily the responsibility of Indian Navy and Coast Guard which is under the
Ministry of Defence. This by itself is a major functional anomaly. Even the
Marine Police is not under the Home Ministry being the local Police of the
State/UT and as by the fact that local policing is a State subject.
Considering the many issues involved and lack of State / UT
focus on this aspect of national security, there is a need to create a Coastal
Security Force on the lines of the BSF with similar legal jurisdiction along
the coast in a swathe five km into the sea from the base line and five km
inland too, a total band of 10 km including land and sea. Also, since this zone
is prone to crime which is the responsibility of the local police, therefore
the local police should have Police Stations adjacent to the Coastal Security
Force Posts to assist in curbing criminal activity and its investigations.
Conclusion
India has continued to be a target of terrorist attacks for
over three decades. Coastal security is axiomatic to India's security and
development goals. The tiered concept of security provided by the Navy, Coast
Guard and Marine Police incorporating the Customs, Ports authority and
Fisheries department is fundamentally sound. Round the clock vigil through
assertive posture and deployment and optimized response capability should be
the order of the day. While the Navy is anointed the lead authority for coastal
security, the desired level of synergy between all ministries, departments and
agencies continues to be lacking.
Designating landing points and monitoring these needs to
commence at the earliest. Similarly, registration of all seagoing vessels of
all sizes should also be expeditiously undertaken. Ownership of fishing vessels
and verification of the crew also needs to be undertaken on a war footing. To
implement these provisions for the states the Marine Police needs to be
strengthened, suitably manned, equipped and very well trained.
Guarding the coast should be viewed the same as guarding the
land borders of the country. Multiple agencies under no central controlling
authority is the bĂȘte noire for accountability. Creating a Central Coastal
Security Force like the BSF is the need of the hour, along with this Central
Training Institute for training and specialisation should also be set up.
Hey people I like this, as this post provided much information on measures for coastal security network, must read this blog. #suryathinktank #suryafoundation
ReplyDelete